Opportunity dossier O-0144

Recurring need documented in 1 independent public source item.

Original-language research note

工作项层级结构可视化工具
为项目管理工具增加层级树形视图，让复杂任务结构一目了然

First seen 2026-07-10 · Last updated 2026-07-15 · Recalculated daily

4.2

Evidence confidence, not a return forecast

Independent source items, deduplicated by post

Public source families

Payment evidence: current spend or explicit intent

ProblemThe source-linked evidence below documents the recurring problem.

People affectedPeople represented in the linked public discussions.

Named alternativesNo existing alternative is named in the qualifying evidence yet.

Weekly mentions · 12 weeksNEW

04-2705-2506-2207-13

Trend factor ×1.0, capped at 2.0.

Representative evidence

1 public excerpts · 1 items in the full chain

Need★★★☆☆Feature request

是否已有相关 issue？ [x] 我已搜索过现有 issue 摘要作为一个用户，我希望能够按层级顺序查看所有工作项，并分别展开每一层，以便更好地概览所有待处理任务。在 Azure Dev Ops 中是这样解决的： <img width="700" height="383" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user attachments/assets/ Chinese research excerpt

Use the source link for the original-language context.

GitHub Issues2026-07-10View source ↗

Follow the full evidence chain

Traceable items · inspectable scoring · warming and payment alerts

Join the waitlist Get weekly changes

Scoring summary

Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.

“Evidence-backed” means the problem appears real, recurring and connected to spending. It does not mean the business is worth building. Read the full methodology.