Opportunity ledger / Dossier O-0144
Recurring need documented in 2 independent public source items.
First seen 2026-07-10 · Last updated 2026-08-29 · Recalculated daily
Trend factor ×0.5, capped at 2.0.
Post title: What is a good app/program to help organize my projects at work as a marketing supervisor?
I'm looking for a good all-in-one program that hel…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: [feature]: New display option to show work items in the hierarchy
### Is there an existing issue for this? - [x] I have searched the existing issues ### Summary As a user I want to be able to see all the work items in their hierarchical order and expand each leve…
What this evidence does not show yet
To reach Corroborated we still need:
No first-hand payment statement is on record here, so this page carries no pricing suggestion. A price with no payment evidence behind it is a guess wearing a number.
Follow how this opportunity evolves
Every item traceable · free · we email you only when this market actually changes
Scoring summary
Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.
“Payment-backed” means first-hand payment evidence exists in the record. It does not mean the business is worth building. “Fading” is a recency tag shown alongside any evidence level, not a lower level. Read the full methodology.