Opportunity ledger / Dossier O-1553

SignalNEWOPPORTUNITY DOSSIER · O-1553

option to ignore all-day

First seen 2026-07-29 · Last updated 2026-07-30 · Recalculated daily

4.2
Evidence confidence, not a return forecast
1
Independent source items, deduplicated by post
1
Public source families
0
Payment evidence: current spend or explicit intent
Problem
People affected
Named alternativesNo existing alternative is named in the qualifying evidence yet.
Weekly mentions · 12 weeksNEW
05-1106-0807-0607-27

Trend factor ×1.0, capped at 2.0.

Representative evidence

1 public excerpts · 1 items in the full chain
Need★★★☆☆Product gap

Post title: Feature: option to ignore all-day events in availability checks (global default + per event-type override)

## Problem All-day events on a connected calendar consume availability, even when: - the event is explicitly marked `TRANSP:TRANSPARENT` / "Show as: Free" in Google Calendar, or - the user simply does…

GitHub Issues2026-07-29View source ↗

What this evidence does not show yet

Only one independent item so far. One voice is a signal, not evidence of recurrence — treat this as a lead to investigate, not a validated need.

To reach Corroborated we still need:

  • 2 more independent post(s) — we have 1
  • the same need restated in another source family, or by 3 different authors

No first-hand payment statement is on record here, so this page carries no pricing suggestion. A price with no payment evidence behind it is a guess wearing a number.

Follow how this opportunity evolves

Every item traceable · free · we email you only when this market actually changes

Scoring summary

Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.

“Payment-backed” means first-hand payment evidence exists in the record. It does not mean the business is worth building. “Fading” is a recency tag shown alongside any evidence level, not a lower level. Read the full methodology.