Public Evidence Lab / Dossier O-2271
Collected sample: 16 independent content items across 2 source families. Known publication dates: 2026-08-08 — 2026-10-29.
First seen 2026-08-08 · Last updated 2026-11-07 · Recalculated daily
These observations describe collected samples, not platform-wide prevalence; they cannot establish whether a problem is widespread or accelerating. Collection scope changed on 09-16 and 09-27; monthly counts must not be read as trends.
Post title: Multiple Codex Accounts
I am anyway subscribed to both codex and Claude co…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Is Claude 20x actually 20x?
I legitimately thought maybe I was doing something wrong but I haven’t changed any of my practises and approaches for at least a month or two and it’s definitely gotten way dumber and making way more …
Post title: [TLDR] Is Claude Code getting worse at actually following instructions lately, or I'm losing my mind? [via r/claude]
Right now, I'm spending almost as much time correc…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Nouveau sur Cursor et je pleure
for $20 I'd definitely get my money's worth. I ori…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Tibo and OpenAI: Who should pay when Codex ignores explicit instructions and consumes hours of usage repairing its own mistakes?
The user had to spend substantial time identifying…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: [TLDR] Opus 5 writes so poorly that it made me walk away from all my projects [via r/ClaudeCode]
Opus 5 is so bad at writing responses that I'm wil…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Ask HN: Opus 5.5 suddenly dumb as rocks?
Is it just me, or has Opus suddenly turned dumb as rocks with 0 attention span over the last half day or so? Noticeably worse output across multiple agents on very different projects.
Post title: anybody is feeling the same feel about Agents?
even though while it's completed the implementatio…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Anyone else finding AI agents harder to use than expected?
I’ve been playing around with Claude and ChatGPT f…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: moved from a no code website builder to actually vibecoding the site and here's what genuinely surprised me
vibecoding gave me a blank canvas and a very confi…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Interesting inconsistency between accounts
When I’m using my new account, Opus is slower than…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Ask HN: What LLM subscription/provider to use with pi harness?
I used to use Claude code but obviously they gone downhill for the last 2 to 3 months. I switched to Codex and have been happy with it.
Post title: Opus 5 regularly ignoring caveman
❯ why are you not using the caveman mode? ⏺ You ri…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Calling the AI bluff: Adding "Do not guess" cut made-up claims from 71% to 20%
I've tried all of these and nothing really works. I have only 1 line in my CLAUDE.md file and that is "Always ground your responses." and that's it. Claude didn't care about it. When I pointed that ou…
Post title: [r/ClaudeAI] Title: Anyone else feel like claude code works better on some days than others?
Hey guys, this is going to sound a bit weird but i…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
What this evidence does not show yet
This dossier already carries first-hand payment evidence. What it still cannot tell you: market size, how reachable these people are, or what it costs to acquire them.
Follow how this opportunity evolves
Every item traceable · free · we email you only when this market actually changes
Scoring summary
Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.
“Payment-backed” means first-hand payment evidence exists in the record. It does not mean the business is worth building. “Fading” is a recency tag shown alongside any evidence level, not a lower level. Read the full methodology.