Opportunity dossier O-0115

Recurring need documented in 1 independent public source item.

Original-language research note

时间段座位容量差异化配置
解决活动/课程等场景下同一事件类型内各时间段需要不同座位上限的管理需求

First seen 2026-07-07 · Last updated 2026-07-15 · Recalculated daily

2.1

Evidence confidence, not a return forecast

Independent source items, deduplicated by post

Public source families

Payment evidence: current spend or explicit intent

ProblemThe source-linked evidence below documents the recurring problem.

People affectedPeople represented in the linked public discussions.

Named alternativesNo existing alternative is named in the qualifying evidence yet.

Weekly mentions · 12 weeks

04-2705-2506-2207-13

Trend factor ×0.5, capped at 2.0.

Representative evidence

1 public excerpts · 1 items in the full chain

Solution gap★★★☆☆First-hand pain

目前seatsPerTimeSlot将一个固定值应用于事件类型生成的每个可预订时间段。没有办法在同一日/事件类型中为单个时间段设置不同的座位容量。 Chinese research excerpt

Use the source link for the original-language context.

GitHub Issues2026-07-07View source ↗

Follow the full evidence chain

Traceable items · inspectable scoring · warming and payment alerts

Join the waitlist Get weekly changes

Scoring summary

Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.

“Evidence-backed” means the problem appears real, recurring and connected to spending. It does not mean the business is worth building. Read the full methodology.