Public Evidence Lab / Dossier O-2338
Collected sample: 7 independent content items across 1 source families. Known publication dates: 2026-07-14 — 2026-11-07.
First seen 2026-07-14 · Last updated 2026-11-08 · Recalculated daily
These observations describe collected samples, not platform-wide prevalence; they cannot establish whether a problem is widespread or accelerating. Collection scope changed on 09-16 and 09-27; monthly counts must not be read as trends.
Post title: ⚠️ WARNING: Cheap $1.25 IQ Test Turns Into Recurring Charges? My Experience With Persolabs and PersoLibrary
I'm posting this to warn other Canadians about an …
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Cursor charged me ₹2,364 after cancellation, but my account is now on the Free plan, refund?
On August 18, 2026, Cursor charged ₹2,364.52 ($23.…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: CARPE, THE BEST DEODERANT HANDS DOWN. THE WORST COMPANY HANDS DOWN.
Misleading sales tactics trapping you into a subsc…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Formal Refund Request – Charged USD 199.96 in Total and Billing Continued After I Requested Cancellation
On August 13 and August 14, I contacted PDF Guru s…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: "Butt dialing" Subscriptions?
Wouldn't there be (SHOULDN'T THERE BE) an extensiv…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: SHADY business pratices through and through!! I DID NOT SUBSCRIBE WTF!!!
I was only trying to log in and they charged for f…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
What this evidence does not show yet
This dossier already carries first-hand payment evidence. What it still cannot tell you: market size, how reachable these people are, or what it costs to acquire them.
Follow how this opportunity evolves
Every item traceable · free · we email you only when this market actually changes
Scoring summary
Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.
“Payment-backed” means first-hand payment evidence exists in the record. It does not mean the business is worth building. “Fading” is a recency tag shown alongside any evidence level, not a lower level. Read the full methodology.