Opportunity dossier O-0164

Recurring need documented in 1 independent public source item.

Original-language research note

屏幕共享指向增强方案
解决远程屏幕共享时光标指向不清晰、难以定位的问题，提升协作沟通效率

First seen 2026-07-11 · Last updated 2026-07-15 · Recalculated daily

4.2

Evidence confidence, not a return forecast

Independent source items, deduplicated by post

Public source families

Payment evidence: current spend or explicit intent

ProblemThe source-linked evidence below documents the recurring problem.

People affectedPeople represented in the linked public discussions.

Named alternativesNo existing alternative is named in the qualifying evidence yet.

Weekly mentions · 12 weeksNEW

04-2705-2506-2207-13

Trend factor ×1.0, capped at 2.0.

Representative evidence

1 public excerpts · 1 items in the full chain

Pain★★★☆☆First-hand pain

没法真正指向。在现场你只需要把手指放在屏幕上或者用鼠标指向那个东西。但共享时，光标很小，在所有东西中不够突出，我最后只能口头描述方向——「点右上角的图标，不对，另一个右上角」 Chinese research excerpt

Use the source link for the original-language context.

Reddit2026-07-11View source ↗

Follow the full evidence chain

Traceable items · inspectable scoring · warming and payment alerts

Join the waitlist Get weekly changes

Scoring summary

Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.

“Evidence-backed” means the problem appears real, recurring and connected to spending. It does not mean the business is worth building. Read the full methodology.