Opportunity dossier O-0372

Recurring need documented in 1 independent public source item.

Original-language research note

项目模块描述字段工具
为项目管理工具的模块(Modules)添加纯文本/富文本描述字段，自动汇总跨项目目的与范围，便于新成员快速理解模块上下文

First seen 2026-07-16 · Last updated 2026-07-17 · Recalculated daily

4.2

Evidence confidence, not a return forecast

Independent source items, deduplicated by post

Public source families

Payment evidence: current spend or explicit intent

ProblemThe source-linked evidence below documents the recurring problem.

People affectedPeople represented in the linked public discussions.

Named alternativesNo existing alternative is named in the qualifying evidence yet.

Weekly mentions · 12 weeksNEW

04-2705-2506-2207-13

Trend factor ×1.0, capped at 2.0.

Representative evidence

1 public excerpts · 1 items in the full chain

Need★★★☆☆Feature request

Post title: [feature]: Add plain text/rich text description field to Modules

是否已有相关 issue？ [x] 我已搜索过现有 issue 概述为 Modules 添加一个描述字段，类似于 Work Items 中已有的那个（纯文本即可，富文本格式化是加分项）。这能让用户直接在 Module 所属的位置记录其目的、范围或高层级摘要，从而让人一眼就能理解一个 Module 是关于什么的——在入职新成员或回顾较老的 Module 时尤其有用。为什么应该处理这个问题？此功 Chinese research excerpt

Use the source link for the original-language context.

GitHub Issues2026-07-16View source ↗

Follow the full evidence chain

Traceable items · inspectable scoring · warming and payment alerts

Join the waitlist Get weekly changes

Scoring summary

Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.

“Evidence-backed” means the problem appears real, recurring and connected to spending. It does not mean the business is worth building. Read the full methodology.