Public Evidence Lab / Dossier O-2547
Collected sample: 4 independent content items across 1 source families. Known publication dates: 2026-08-09 — 2026-10-30.
First seen 2026-08-09 · Last updated 2026-11-09 · Recalculated daily
These observations describe collected samples, not platform-wide prevalence; they cannot establish whether a problem is widespread or accelerating. Collection scope changed on 09-16 and 09-27; monthly counts must not be read as trends.
Post title: Am I being scammed, or is this a legit way to grow my consulting business?
There is a cost for campaign creation, I pay for t…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: ad agency
ever since I hired an agency, my business has been…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Should I be concerned about the PPC agency I’ve hired?
Ads went live 4 weeks ago. One lead so far (highly…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
What this evidence does not show yet
To reach Payment-backed we still need:
Follow how this opportunity evolves
Every item traceable · free · we email you only when this market actually changes
Scoring summary
Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.
“Payment-backed” means first-hand payment evidence exists in the record. It does not mean the business is worth building. “Fading” is a recency tag shown alongside any evidence level, not a lower level. Read the full methodology.