Opportunity dossier O-0067

Recurring need documented in 1 independent public source item.

Original-language research note

永久问答知识库平台
构建一个不可删除、无管理员的问答平台，言论永久留存、分值公开加权

First seen 2026-06-20 · Last updated 2026-07-15 · Recalculated daily

2.1

Evidence confidence, not a return forecast

Independent source items, deduplicated by post

Public source families

Payment evidence: current spend or explicit intent

ProblemThe source-linked evidence below documents the recurring problem.

People affectedPeople represented in the linked public discussions.

Named alternativesNo existing alternative is named in the qualifying evidence yet.

Weekly mentions · 12 weeks▼ Fading

04-2705-2506-2207-13

Trend factor ×0.5, capped at 2.0.

Representative evidence

1 public excerpts · 1 items in the full chain

Need★★★☆☆Feature request

我正在寻找一个不可删除的类似Stack Overflow/Stack Exchange的应用程序，用户分数对每个读者都是特定加权的，这些分数是公开的，且没有管理员角色。当我说不可删除时，我的意思是：我不仅仅想要一个可以安装在自己HTTP服务器上的类似GitLab的应用程序，我想要的是一个类似GitLab的不可删除的应用程序，一个 uapp （如果你想写不可删除 indeletable 可以随意叫 Chinese research excerpt

Use the source link for the original-language context.

SoftwareRecs SE2026-06-20View source ↗

Follow the full evidence chain

Traceable items · inspectable scoring · warming and payment alerts

Join the waitlist Get weekly changes

Scoring summary

Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.

“Evidence-backed” means the problem appears real, recurring and connected to spending. It does not mean the business is worth building. Read the full methodology.