Public Evidence Lab / Dossier O-7754
Collected sample: 5 independent content items across 1 source families. Known publication dates: 2026-09-24 — 2026-10-21.
First seen 2026-09-24 · Last updated 2026-11-09 · Recalculated daily
These observations describe collected samples, not platform-wide prevalence; they cannot establish whether a problem is widespread or accelerating. Collection scope changed on 09-16 and 09-27; monthly counts must not be read as trends.
Post title: Ad account hacked and charged $1,129.89 for a hacker’s shoe ads. Meta has ignored my refund request for 2 weeks and PayPal denied my dispute. How do I actually …
Ad account hacked and charged $1,129.89 for a hack…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Stolen money from a card on Meta platforms — has anyone managed to get it back?
I was a victim of a Meta account hack. Basically, …
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Several client Meta ad accounts were compromised. Has anyone recovered unauthorized ad spend?
Several client Meta ad accounts were compromised. …
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: URGENT: Business Manager Hacked - Hackers set $20k/day budgets on all client accounts. anyone how to stop it?
Our agency's Meta Business Manager was just compro…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Client's Meta BM got hacked, attacker spent $32K in one night. We got a full refund today.
our client's Meta BM got hacked 2 weeks ago. The a…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
What this evidence does not show yet
To reach Payment-backed we still need:
No first-hand payment statement is on record here, so this page carries no pricing suggestion. A price with no payment evidence behind it is a guess wearing a number.
Follow how this opportunity evolves
Every item traceable · free · we email you only when this market actually changes
Scoring summary
Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.
“Payment-backed” means first-hand payment evidence exists in the record. It does not mean the business is worth building. “Fading” is a recency tag shown alongside any evidence level, not a lower level. Read the full methodology.