Public Evidence Lab / Dossier O-8363
Collected sample: 6 independent content items across 1 source families. Known publication dates: 2026-09-29 — 2026-11-10.
First seen 2026-09-29 · Last updated 2026-11-15 · Recalculated daily
These observations describe collected samples, not platform-wide prevalence; they cannot establish whether a problem is widespread or accelerating. Collection scope changed on 09-16 and 09-27; monthly counts must not be read as trends.
Post title: Pull Mitya and Risk No Zibai, or Just Pull Zibai and wait for Mitya Rerun? (60 Wishes, 60 Pity, 50/50)
I'm also a low spender (mostly just Welkins and Ba…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: This is Unacceptable
The value as a pass is god awful. It costs the sam…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: CONGRATULATIONS...
Okay now look: paying 44$ for Isabel's new skin is…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Highway robbery
i dont wanna spend 8 pounds on a game i play for f…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Would they change these? What I would change
Attachments are overpriced. Many attachments go un…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Message to Inkwell: How to Actually Improve the Game
As an endgame player who can clear Destiny Limbo, …
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
What this evidence does not show yet
This dossier already carries first-hand payment evidence. What it still cannot tell you: market size, how reachable these people are, or what it costs to acquire them.
Follow how this opportunity evolves
Every item traceable · free · we email you only when this market actually changes
Scoring summary
Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.
“Payment-backed” means first-hand payment evidence exists in the record. It does not mean the business is worth building. “Fading” is a recency tag shown alongside any evidence level, not a lower level. Read the full methodology.