Opportunity dossier O-0312

Recurring need documented in 1 independent public source item.

Original-language research note

表单UTM参数丢失追踪修复工具
解决表单提交重定向时UTM参数丢失问题，确保营销归因数据完整，避免广告效果误判

First seen 2026-07-15 · Last updated 2026-07-16 · Recalculated daily

5.5

Evidence confidence, not a return forecast

Independent source items, deduplicated by post

Public source families

Payment evidence: current spend or explicit intent

ProblemThe source-linked evidence below documents the recurring problem.

People affectedPeople represented in the linked public discussions.

Named alternativesNo existing alternative is named in the qualifying evidence yet.

Weekly mentions · 12 weeksNEW

04-2705-2506-2207-13

Trend factor ×1.0, capped at 2.0.

Representative evidence

1 public excerpts · 1 items in the full chain

Solution gap★★★★☆Feature request

Post title: [Feature] Track UTM tags on routing form submissions

当填写路由表单并重定向到自定义页面时，UTM参数不会被记录。由于此流程中不会创建任何预约，因此没有对象可以附加UTM数据 Chinese research excerpt

Use the source link for the original-language context.

GitHub Issues2026-07-15View source ↗

Follow the full evidence chain

Traceable items · inspectable scoring · warming and payment alerts

Join the waitlist Get weekly changes

Scoring summary

Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.

“Evidence-backed” means the problem appears real, recurring and connected to spending. It does not mean the business is worth building. Read the full methodology.