Public Evidence Lab / Dossier O-7335
Collected sample: 4 independent content items across 1 source families. Known publication dates: 2026-09-21 — 2026-11-02.
First seen 2026-09-21 · Last updated 2026-11-05 · Recalculated daily
These observations describe collected samples, not platform-wide prevalence; they cannot establish whether a problem is widespread or accelerating. Collection scope changed on 09-16 and 09-27; monthly counts must not be read as trends.
Post title: Vercel still billing me monthly for 6 months after I deleted my account, and billing won’t reply
Since then I’ve been charged $60 a month for “v0 S…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Amazon Seller IT Support
Nun scheint aber ein Abo innerhalb des gelöschten …
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Be careful with subscription
I got a notification that I was charged $40 throug…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Being Charged for an Account that no longer exists.
I recently tried Eleven Voice Reader Service on go…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
What this evidence does not show yet
To reach Payment-backed we still need:
Follow how this opportunity evolves
Every item traceable · free · we email you only when this market actually changes
Scoring summary
Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.
“Payment-backed” means first-hand payment evidence exists in the record. It does not mean the business is worth building. “Fading” is a recency tag shown alongside any evidence level, not a lower level. Read the full methodology.