Opportunity dossier O-0109

Recurring need documented in 2 independent public source items.

Original-language research note

跨应用表格粘贴兼容问题
用户在复制表格粘贴到不同应用时遇到格式丢失或错乱问题

First seen 2026-07-05 · Last updated 2026-07-15 · Recalculated daily

16.5

Evidence confidence, not a return forecast

Independent source items, deduplicated by post

Public source families

Payment evidence: current spend or explicit intent

ProblemThe source-linked evidence below documents the recurring problem.

People affectedPeople represented in the linked public discussions.

Named alternativesNo existing alternative is named in the qualifying evidence yet.

Weekly mentions · 12 weeks▲ Warming ×2.0

04-2705-2506-2207-13

Trend factor ×2.0, capped at 2.0.

Representative evidence

2 public excerpts · 2 items in the full chain

Need★★★☆☆Feature request

我想从GeoGebra电子表格复制数值到Excel 365。然而，显而易见的方法"选择单元格，Ctrl C，Ctrl V"会把公式复制到Excel，而不是数值。我用GeoGebra做了一个小模拟，在GeoGebra的电子表格中计算了大约250行数据（4列）。现在我想用Excel 365分享这些数据。所以我尝试把数字复制粘贴到Excel。但是当我这样做时，我只复制了公式。下面是一个最小工作示例： Chinese research excerpt

Use the source link for the original-language context.

SoftwareRecs SE2026-07-08View source ↗

Need★★☆☆☆Feature request

我可以使用 ctrl/cmd + c/v 复制一个简单表格并粘贴到另一个位置 Chinese research excerpt

Use the source link for the original-language context.

GitHub Issues2026-07-05View source ↗

Follow the full evidence chain

Traceable items · inspectable scoring · warming and payment alerts

Join the waitlist Get weekly changes

Scoring summary

Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.

“Evidence-backed” means the problem appears real, recurring and connected to spending. It does not mean the business is worth building. Read the full methodology.