Opportunity ledger / Dossier O-3212
Recurring need documented in 12 independent public source items.
First seen 2026-08-18 · Last updated 2026-10-13 · Recalculated daily
These observations describe collected samples, not platform-wide prevalence; they cannot establish whether a problem is widespread or accelerating. Collection scope changed on 09-16 and 09-27; monthly counts must not be read as trends.
Post title: Is it just me, or has Claude Opus gotten worse recently?
we pay the same subscription price, but we either burn way more Opus tokens on endless retries, or we are forced to spend money on more expensive Fable tokens to get the quality we used to have.
Post title: I recently changed to Chatgpt pro, and I am super happy about it.
the mistakes became bigger, Claude even owned 90% …
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Unlock all 12 evidence items — free
Leave your email to unlock the full evidence chain — every qualifying item, quote and source link — for every dossier in this browser. That is the whole reward: no export, no file, no report. Free, and the weekly digest stays opt-in below.
✓ Unlocked — reloading…
What this evidence does not show yet
To reach Payment-backed we still need:
Follow how this opportunity evolves
Every item traceable · free · we email you only when this market actually changes
Scoring summary
Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.
“Payment-backed” means first-hand payment evidence exists in the record. It does not mean the business is worth building. “Fading” is a recency tag shown alongside any evidence level, not a lower level. Read the full methodology.