Opportunity ledger / Dossier O-13310
Recurring need documented in 2 independent public source items.
First seen 2026-10-26 · Last updated 2026-10-27 · Recalculated daily
These observations describe collected samples, not platform-wide prevalence; they cannot establish whether a problem is widespread or accelerating. Collection scope changed on 09-16 and 09-27; monthly counts must not be read as trends.
Post title: Add data table component to the audit log view
Expected: • the audit log view uses a data table component to list the logged read access and authentication events • columns can be sorted and the table keeps its layout when the list is long
Post title: Add filter panel component to the audit log view
Expected: • the audit log view uses a filter panel component to narrow the logged read access and authentication events • filters apply to the list without leaving the page
What this evidence does not show yet
To reach Corroborated we still need:
No first-hand payment statement is on record here, so this page carries no pricing suggestion. A price with no payment evidence behind it is a guess wearing a number.
Follow how this opportunity evolves
Every item traceable · free · we email you only when this market actually changes
Scoring summary
Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.
“Payment-backed” means first-hand payment evidence exists in the record. It does not mean the business is worth building. “Fading” is a recency tag shown alongside any evidence level, not a lower level. Read the full methodology.