Public Evidence Lab / Dossier O-8403
Collected sample: 10 independent content items across 1 source families. Known publication dates: 2026-09-30 — 2026-11-05.
First seen 2026-09-30 · Last updated 2026-11-15 · Recalculated daily
These observations describe collected samples, not platform-wide prevalence; they cannot establish whether a problem is widespread or accelerating. Collection scope changed on 09-16 and 09-27; monthly counts must not be read as trends.
Post title: Lost ~90% of traffic overnight after AI Overview changes
My site was getting a lot of impressions and click…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Poor visibility on AIO only. Getting Cited on Gemini, ChatGPT, and Google
In all possible keywords where our page is ranking…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Poor visibility on AIO only. Getting Cited on Gemini, ChatGPT, and Google
In all possible keywords where our page is ranking…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Is anyone tracking whether their SaaS gets cited in ChatGPT or Perplexity answers?
Traditional SEO tells you if you rank on Google. B…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: How do I get more clicks on AI overviews?
I understand most clicks are being eaten by AI ove…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Can AI Overview answers be changed?
For some of our most important keywords, we used t…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: What is the real competitive advantage when AI search keeps citing someone else?
Our SEO reports look fine, but the AI answers our …
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: ai overviews are on almost every search in our niche now and never cite us.. how are you getting pulled into them
ran 12 of our core category queries this morning. …
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: How are you measuring whether you show up in AI answers at all?
We could not improve what we could not see. We wor…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
Post title: Need suggestions to get cited in AI overviews
AI is recommending my competitors over me, what ca…
The public layer keeps only a minimal excerpt. Open the source for full context.
What this evidence does not show yet
To reach Payment-backed we still need:
No first-hand payment statement is on record here, so this page carries no pricing suggestion. A price with no payment evidence behind it is a guess wearing a number.
Follow how this opportunity evolves
Every item traceable · free · we email you only when this market actually changes
Scoring summary
Evidence confidence = strength × evidence volume × source diversity × payment × competition × trend × 10. Counts use independent content items; only first-hand pain, current spend, explicit willingness to pay and concrete feature requests affect the score. Repeated posts by one author are discounted. Scoring and status changes follow deterministic rules.
“Payment-backed” means first-hand payment evidence exists in the record. It does not mean the business is worth building. “Fading” is a recency tag shown alongside any evidence level, not a lower level. Read the full methodology.